In a judgment issued on Wednesday, November 10 (obtained by painting), the judge ruled in favor of Vogue magazine Publisher Condé Nast, has issued a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction against the rapper. The judge found that Condé Nast owns the “valid and non-disputable” trademarks and logo of Vogue and that Drake, 21 Savage and telecoms company Hiltzik Strategies “created and disseminated” fake photos Vogue magazine Cover, as well as a reproduction of the entire issue, without the magazine’s permission.
More Rolling Stones
Condé Nast is likely to succeed in its allegations of federal and common law trademark infringement, false appellation of origin, unfair competition, false endorsement, and mitigation, [and] False advertising, “the ruling also states. The judge also said Drake and 21 slip Vogue magazine was “confuses consumers about the origin, sponsorship or approval of the magazine,” “misleads consumers into believing that these are authentic and authentic materials associated with Condé Nast and Vogue magazine.”
Drake and 21 Savage’s lawyer did not return immediately rolling rockRequest for comment, nor Hiltzik Strategies. Condé Nast’s lawyer also did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Drake and 21 Savage were in tears promoting their collaborative album lose it With a series of stunts. the couple fake Saturday Night Live performance Led in what appears to be a gold ingot for Enhanced Colors by Fu x Studios. Their initial promotion, though – imitated Vogue magazine Cover – led to a trademark infringement lawsuit brought by the owner of the magazine, Advance Magazine Publishers Inc. , also known as Condé Nast.
In the lawsuit you got rolling rockCondé Nast described the duo’s promotional stunt as a “scam campaign” that the company did not authorize. Fake Vogue magazine The association included posters and distributed “fake number of Vogue magazineIn large cities across North America.
The lawsuit accuses the rapper of deliberately mimicking publications that the magazine uses in its own promotions to appear authentic, and added that the rapper’s social media accounts contain “frankly false statements:” My brother and I are on newsstands tomorrow!! Thank you @voguemagazine and Anna Wintour for the love and support at this historic moment. lose it November 4th. “
However, according to the complaint, Vogue magazine and its editor-in-chief Wintour “did not participate in lose it or promoted, and not endorsed in any way. Nor did Condé Nast authorize, let alone support, the creation of a fake case and its widespread dissemination Vogue magazine, or a fake version of perhaps the most carefully curated covers in all of the publishing service promoting the Defendants’ new album. “
The complaint further states that “the confusion prevailing among the public is unmistakable,” citing a number of media outlets that picked up the story as true and subsequent user comments believing it to be a true cover.
At the time of filing the lawsuit, Larry Stein, the defendants’ attorney, refused rolling rockA request for comment on Tuesday has not yet reviewed the complaint. Hiltzik Strategies LLC, also named for the defendant in the lawsuit along with Drake and 21 Savage, declined rolling rockComment request.
Condé Nast is seeking at least $4 million in damages. It also seeks punitive damages and terminates any trademark infringement.
This story was updated on 10/11/22 at 12:58 PM ET with a judge’s ruling.
The best of Rolling Stone